Skip Navigation


The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences Advance Access originally published online on March 18, 2009
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 2009 64B(3):369-377; doi:10.1093/geronb/gbn040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
64B/3/369    most recent
gbn040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Andreski, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Andreski, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Health and Functioning Among Baby Boomers Approaching 60

Linda G. Martin1, Vicki A. Freedman2, Robert F. Schoeni3 and Patricia M. Andreski3

1 RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia
2 School of Public Health, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey
3 Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Address correspondence to Linda G. Martin, PhD, RAND Corporation, 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202. Email: lmartin{at}rand.org


  Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether the health and functioning of the Baby Boom generation are better or worse than those of previous cohorts in middle age.

Methods: Trend analysis of vital statistics and self-reports from the National Health Interview Survey for the 40–59 population. Specific outcomes (years of data): mortality (1982–2004); poor or fair health (1982–2006); nine conditions (1997–2006); physical functional limitations (1997–2006); and needing help with personal care, routine needs, or either (1997–2006).

Results: In 2005, the mortality rate of 59-year-olds, the leading edge of the Baby Boom, was 31% lower than that of 59-year-olds in 1982 (8.3 vs. 12.1 per 1,000). There was a similar proportional decline in poor/fair health, but the decline reversed in the last decade. From 1997 to 2006, the prevalence of reports of four conditions increased significantly, but this trend may reflect improvements in diagnosis and treatment. Functional limitations and need for help with routine needs were stable, but the need for help with personal care, while quite low, increased.

Discussion: Trends varied by indicator, period, and age. It is surprising that, given the socioeconomic, medical, and public health advantages of Baby Boomers throughout their lives, they are not doing considerably better on all counts.

Key Words: Trends • Mortality • Chronic Conditions • Functioning • Disability • Baby Boom

Received July 28, 2008; Accepted November 26, 2008

Decision Editor: Kenneth F. Ferraro, PhD


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.