<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences - current issue</title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1758-5368</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>November 2009</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1079-5014</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/687?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/696?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/704?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/723?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/742?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/749?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/750?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/758?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/767?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/777?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/788?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/799?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cover]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cover]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cover</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp086</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PhySciencetoc]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PhySciencetoc]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp088</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Soctoc]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Soctoc]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/687?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Patient and Caregiver Reports of Patient Activity Participation and Its Relationship to Mental Health in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/687?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The relationship between engagement in pleasant activities as rated by the patient and as rated by the caregiver from the patient's perspective was examined using structural equation modeling in a sample of patients (<I>N</I> = 277) diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. The two activity participation ratings were only moderately related to one another. Furthermore, depression was the only significant predictor of the patient-rated activity participation, whereas severity of depression, degree of personality change, level of dependence, and cognition were all significant predictors of caregiver-rated activity participation. These findings suggest that caregivers consider a wider range of variables when evaluating the patient's engagement in activities than does the patient. Predictors of patient-rated activity participation did not differ as a function of age or cognition.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siedlecki, K. L., Tatarina, O., Sanders, L., Albert, M., Blacker, D., Dubois, B., Brandt, J., Stern, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Patient and Caregiver Reports of Patient Activity Participation and Its Relationship to Mental Health in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>695</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>687</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/696?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recognition of Facial, Auditory, and Bodily Emotions in Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/696?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Understanding older adults&rsquo; social functioning difficulties requires insight into their recognition of emotion processing in voices and bodies, not just faces, the focus of most prior research. We examined 60 young and 61 older adults&rsquo; recognition of basic emotions in facial, vocal, and bodily expressions, and when matching faces and bodies to voices, using 120 emotion items. Older adults were worse than young adults in 17 of 30 comparisons, with consistent difficulties in recognizing both positive (happy) and negative (angry and sad) vocal and bodily expressions. Nearly three quarters of older adults functioned at a level similar to the lowest one fourth of young adults, suggesting that age-related changes are common. In addition, we found that older adults&rsquo; difficulty in matching emotions was not explained by difficulty on the component sources (i.e., faces or voices on their own), suggesting an additional problem of integration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruffman, T., Halberstadt, J., Murray, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recognition of Facial, Auditory, and Bodily Emotions in Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>703</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>696</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/704?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceived Need for Mental Health Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/704?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Only half of older adults with a mental disorder use mental health services, and little is known about the causes of perceived need for mental health care (MHC). We used logistic regression to examine relationships among depression, anxiety, chronic physical illness, alcohol abuse and/or dependence, sociodemographics, and perceived need among a national sample of community-dwelling individuals 65 years of age and older (the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys data set). Less than half of respondents with depression or anxiety perceived a need for care. Perceived need was greater for respondents with more symptoms of depression regardless of whether they met diagnostic criteria for a mental illness. History of chronic physical conditions, history of depression or anxiety, and more severe mental illness were associated with greater perceived need for MHC. Future studies of perceived need should account for individual perceptions of mental illness and treatment and the influence of social networks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garrido, M. M., Kane, R. L., Kaas, M., Kane, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceived Need for Mental Health Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>712</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>704</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/713?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Network Types and Subjective Well-being in Chinese Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/713?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The study examined social network types in a sample of 1,005 older Chinese adults in Hong Kong and the networks&rsquo; relations to subjective well-being. Given the nature of kinship in Chinese society, we broke down social support provision by closeness of blood ties (immediate kin, distant kin, and non-kin). Using <I>K</I>-means cluster analysis, we identified 5 network types: diverse, friend focused, restricted, family focused, and distant family. The latter was characterized by few immediate kin but mostly distant kin. Diverse and family-focused networks were most beneficial to well-being, whereas restricted networks were least. Distant family networks were associated with only marginally lower well-being than family-focused networks and were comparable to friend-focused networks. Results suggested the importance of the extended family in support provision for Chinese older adults, especially in the absence of immediate kin and friends. Implications of the present findings for other cultural groups are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng, S.-T., Lee, C. K. L., Chan, A. C. M., Leung, E. M. F., Lee, J.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Network Types and Subjective Well-being in Chinese Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>722</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>713</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/723?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Felt Obligation to Help Others as a Protective Factor Against Losses in Psychological Well-being Following Functional Decline in Middle and Later Life]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/723?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study examined felt obligation to help others in two domains (close others and society) as protective factors against losses in psychological well-being following functional decline. Lagged-dependent regression models were estimated using data from 849 respondents aged 35&ndash;74 years and without any functional limitations at baseline in the 1995&ndash;2005 National Survey of Midlife in the United States. Greater felt obligation to help close others protected against declining self-acceptance in the face of more severe functional decline, and greater felt obligation to help society protected against declining personal growth and self-acceptance. Greater felt obligation to help close others and society protected against increasing depressive symptoms at younger ages in adulthood. Findings suggest the importance for additional research on how aspects of altruism can promote psychological adaptation to declining functional health in middle and later life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenfield, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp074</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Felt Obligation to Help Others as a Protective Factor Against Losses in Psychological Well-being Following Functional Decline in Middle and Later Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>732</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>723</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/733?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rapid Emotion Regulation After Mood Induction: Age and Individual Differences]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/733?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Previous research has suggested that emotion regulation improves with age. This study examined both age and individual differences in online emotion regulation after a negative mood induction. We found evidence that older adults were more likely to rapidly regulate their emotions than were younger adults. Moreover, older adults who rapidly regulated had lower trait anxiety and depressive symptoms and higher levels of optimism than their same-age peers who did not rapidly regulate. Measuring mood change over an extended time revealed that older rapid regulators still reported increased levels of positive affect over 20 min later, whereas young adult rapid regulators&rsquo; moods had declined. These results highlight the importance of considering individual differences when examining age differences in online emotion regulation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larcom, M. J., Isaacowitz, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rapid Emotion Regulation After Mood Induction: Age and Individual Differences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>741</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>733</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/742?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations Between Psychological Distress, Learning, and Memory in Spouse Caregivers of Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/742?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Family caregivers of older adults experience high levels of chronic stress and psychological distress, which are known to impair cognition. Very little research, however, has assessed the impact of caregiving on key cognitive outcomes such as learning and memory. This study compared 16 spouse caregivers with 16 matched controls using standardized neuropsychological measures of learning, episodic memory, and working memory. Analyses compared groups on these cognitive outcomes and examined whether psychological distress mediated group differences in cognition. Results indicated that caregivers were significantly more distressed than non-caregivers and exhibited deficits in learning, recall of episodic information after short and long delays, and working memory. Furthermore, the majority of group differences in cognitive outcomes were mediated by psychological distress. This study adds to a small body of literature demonstrating impaired cognitive functioning among family caregivers. It also suggests that distress is one of a number of possible underlying mechanisms leading to disruptions in learning and memory in this population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mackenzie, C. S., Wiprzycka, U. J., Hasher, L., Goldstein, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations Between Psychological Distress, Learning, and Memory in Spouse Caregivers of Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>746</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>742</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/749?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editing in the Rearview Mirror]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/749?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferraro, K. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editing in the Rearview Mirror]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>749</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>749</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/750?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Childhood Living Conditions, Socioeconomic Position in Adulthood, and Cognition in Later Life: Exploring the Associations]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/750?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study examined the association between childhood living conditions, socioeconomic position in adulthood, and cognition in later life. Two questions were addressed: Is there an association between childhood living conditions and late-life cognition, and if so, is the association modified or mediated by adult socioeconomic position?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Nationally representative data of the Swedish population aged 77 years and older were obtained from the 1992 and 2002 Swedish Panel Study of Living Conditions of the Oldest Old (SWEOLD). Cognition was assessed with an abbreviated version of the Mini-Mental State Examination scale. Childhood living conditions were assessed by self-reports of childhood living conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results showed independent associations between conflicts in the household during childhood, father's social class, education, own social class in adulthood, and cognition in later life. Exposure to conflicts during childhood, having a father classified as a manual worker, low education, and/or being classified as a manual worker in adulthood was associated with lower levels of cognition in old age. There seemed to be no modifying effect of adult socioeconomic position on the association between childhood conditions and cognition in later life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This suggests the importance of childhood living conditions in maintaining cognitive function even in late life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fors, S., Lennartsson, C., Lundberg, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Childhood Living Conditions, Socioeconomic Position in Adulthood, and Cognition in Later Life: Exploring the Associations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>757</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>750</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/758?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying the Poorest Older Americans]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/758?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Public policies target a subset of the population defined as poor or needy, but rarely are people poor or needy in the same way. This is particularly true among older adults. This study investigates poverty among older adults in order to identify who among them is financially worst off.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We use 20 years of data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey to examine the income and consumption of older Americans.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The poverty rate is cut in fourth if both income and consumption are used to define poverty. Those most likely to be poor defined by only income but not poor defined by income and consumption together are married, White, and homeowners and have a high school diploma or higher. The income poor alone display sufficient assets to raise consumption above poverty thresholds, whereas the consumption poor are shown to have income just above the poverty threshold and few assets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The poorest among the older population are those who are income and consumption poor. Understanding the nature of this double poverty population is important in measuring the success of future public policies to reduce poverty among this group.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fisher, J. D., Johnson, D. S., Marchand, J. T., Smeeding, T. M., Torrey, B. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying the Poorest Older Americans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>766</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>758</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/767?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Childlessness and the Economic Well-being of Older Americans]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/767?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The study's purpose is to examine the relationship between childlessness and two key indicators of older Americans&rsquo; economic well-being: income and wealth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using the Health and Retirement Survey, the study estimates this relationship and compares findings from standard ordinary least squares, random effects, quantile regression, and two propensity score models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with married parents, childless married couples tend to have slightly more income and about 5% more wealth. Unmarried childless men enjoy no income advantage over unmarried fathers but have 24%&ndash;33% more wealth. Compared with older unmarried mothers, unmarried childless women have 12%&ndash;31% more income and about 33% more wealth. The strength of these relationships increases as one moves up the distribution of income or wealth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This study provides evidence on the relationship between childlessness and both income and wealth, including the first evidence for men. The findings may be useful for persons concerned about the determinants of childless adults&rsquo; well-being as well as the long-run financial demands on public programs that provide income support, health and nursing home care, and social services for older Americans.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plotnick, R. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Childlessness and the Economic Well-being of Older Americans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>776</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>767</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/777?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does Household Composition Explain Welfare Regime Poverty Risks for Older Adults and Other Household Members?]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/777?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This cross-national study examines the poverty of older adults and their household members and relates the risk of poverty to macrolevel state approaches to welfare as well as to microlevel composition of households.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data on individuals in households with older adults for 22 countries come from the Luxembourg Income Survey. Robust cluster analysis relates the risk of poverty to the type of state welfare regime; the characteristics of the household head (age, gender, marital status, and education); as well as the household's numbers of earners, older adults, and children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Persons in households with older adults are significantly less likely to be poor in countries with social democratic and conservative welfare regimes than in Taiwan, an exemplar of limited social welfare programs. Controlling for country differences in household composition increases the differences in poverty risks. Living with fewer children, more older adults, and more earners lowers the risk of poverty, as does having a married and better educated household head.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Countries with more generous social welfare provisions have lower risks of poverty despite having household characteristics that are comparatively unfavorable. As Taiwan demonstrates, household composition, particularly a reliance on multigenerational households, compensates for limited state welfare programs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tai, T.-o, Treas, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does Household Composition Explain Welfare Regime Poverty Risks for Older Adults and Other Household Members?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>787</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>777</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/788?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Broader View of Family Caregiving: Effects of Caregiving and Caregiver Conditions on Depressive Symptoms, Health, Work, and Social Isolation]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/788?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Informal caregivers provide the majority of long-term care. This study examined six health and psychosocial outcomes of caregiving, in the context of multiple characteristics of the caregiving situation, in a representative, statewide sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data came from 4,041 respondents to the 2007 Connecticut Long-Term Care Needs Assessment. Analyses investigated whether caregiving negatively affects depressive symptoms, health, missing work, and social isolation. Logistic regressions tested the independent effects of caregiver characteristics and conditions of the caregiving situation on these health and psychosocial outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Caregivers rate their health better than noncaregivers and do not report more depressive symptoms or social isolation. Living with the care receiver, inadequate income, and care receivers&rsquo; unmet need for community-based long-term care services relate to multiple negative outcomes. Care receiver memory problems and caregiver/care receiver relationship do not relate to health or psychosocial outcomes when these other factors are considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Caregiving per se does not lead to symptoms of depression, poor health, or social isolation. Many caregivers do need supports in training and education, respite, and physical and mental health care. Such programs should provide outreach to caregivers facing specific stressful conditions, as not all caregivers experience negative consequences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robison, J., Fortinsky, R., Kleppinger, A., Shugrue, N., Porter, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Broader View of Family Caregiving: Effects of Caregiving and Caregiver Conditions on Depressive Symptoms, Health, Work, and Social Isolation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>798</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>788</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family Caregiver Skills in Medication Management for Hospice Patients: A Qualitative Study to Define a Construct]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To propose a theoretical construct of family caregiver skills in effective medication management for home hospice patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 22 hospice providers (14 nurses, 4 physicians, and 4 social workers) and 23 family caregivers (10 daughters, 4 wives, 2 husbands, and 7 others) of elderly patients (&ge;60 years old) who were receiving home services from four hospice care programs in the Chicago metropolitan area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Although both groups identified similar skill sets, hospice providers emphasized technical skills such as administering medications, and family caregivers valued management skills such as organizing medications, coordinating with hired caregivers, and providing care to patients who resisted treatment. We defined effective medication management in hospice as caregivers&rsquo; ability to effectively relieve symptoms with pharmacological interventions by successfully utilizing skills related to <I>teamwork</I> (coordinate with hospice providers and with other family or hired caregivers), <I>organization</I> (acquire, store, track, and discard medications), <I>symptom knowledge</I> (recognize and interpret common symptoms), <I>medication knowledge</I> (understand the basics of pharmacology and medication administration), and <I>personhood</I> (understand and respond to the patient's needs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The proposed construct of medication management skills in hospice will help guide future development of training interventions and clinical assessment tools.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lau, D. T., Kasper, J. D., Hauser, J. M., Berdes, C., Chang, C.-H., Berman, R. L., Masin-Peters, J., Paice, J., Emanuel, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family Caregiver Skills in Medication Management for Hospice Patients: A Qualitative Study to Define a Construct]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>807</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>