<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences - recent issues</title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1758-5368</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1079-5014</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/687?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/696?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/704?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/723?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/742?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/749?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/750?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/758?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/767?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/777?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/788?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/799?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/543?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/551?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/569?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/577?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/586?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/597?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/608?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/612?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/625?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/635?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/644?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/656?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/666?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/677?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-d?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/443?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/457?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/461?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/470?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/474?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/482?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/497?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/507?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/517?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/528?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cover]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cover]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cover</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp086</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PhySciencetoc]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PhySciencetoc]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp088</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Soctoc]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/NP-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp089</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Soctoc]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/687?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of Patient and Caregiver Reports of Patient Activity Participation and Its Relationship to Mental Health in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/687?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The relationship between engagement in pleasant activities as rated by the patient and as rated by the caregiver from the patient's perspective was examined using structural equation modeling in a sample of patients (<I>N</I> = 277) diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. The two activity participation ratings were only moderately related to one another. Furthermore, depression was the only significant predictor of the patient-rated activity participation, whereas severity of depression, degree of personality change, level of dependence, and cognition were all significant predictors of caregiver-rated activity participation. These findings suggest that caregivers consider a wider range of variables when evaluating the patient's engagement in activities than does the patient. Predictors of patient-rated activity participation did not differ as a function of age or cognition.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siedlecki, K. L., Tatarina, O., Sanders, L., Albert, M., Blacker, D., Dubois, B., Brandt, J., Stern, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of Patient and Caregiver Reports of Patient Activity Participation and Its Relationship to Mental Health in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>695</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>687</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/696?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recognition of Facial, Auditory, and Bodily Emotions in Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/696?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Understanding older adults&rsquo; social functioning difficulties requires insight into their recognition of emotion processing in voices and bodies, not just faces, the focus of most prior research. We examined 60 young and 61 older adults&rsquo; recognition of basic emotions in facial, vocal, and bodily expressions, and when matching faces and bodies to voices, using 120 emotion items. Older adults were worse than young adults in 17 of 30 comparisons, with consistent difficulties in recognizing both positive (happy) and negative (angry and sad) vocal and bodily expressions. Nearly three quarters of older adults functioned at a level similar to the lowest one fourth of young adults, suggesting that age-related changes are common. In addition, we found that older adults&rsquo; difficulty in matching emotions was not explained by difficulty on the component sources (i.e., faces or voices on their own), suggesting an additional problem of integration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruffman, T., Halberstadt, J., Murray, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp072</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recognition of Facial, Auditory, and Bodily Emotions in Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>703</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>696</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/704?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceived Need for Mental Health Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/704?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Only half of older adults with a mental disorder use mental health services, and little is known about the causes of perceived need for mental health care (MHC). We used logistic regression to examine relationships among depression, anxiety, chronic physical illness, alcohol abuse and/or dependence, sociodemographics, and perceived need among a national sample of community-dwelling individuals 65 years of age and older (the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys data set). Less than half of respondents with depression or anxiety perceived a need for care. Perceived need was greater for respondents with more symptoms of depression regardless of whether they met diagnostic criteria for a mental illness. History of chronic physical conditions, history of depression or anxiety, and more severe mental illness were associated with greater perceived need for MHC. Future studies of perceived need should account for individual perceptions of mental illness and treatment and the influence of social networks.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garrido, M. M., Kane, R. L., Kaas, M., Kane, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceived Need for Mental Health Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>712</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>704</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/713?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social Network Types and Subjective Well-being in Chinese Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/713?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The study examined social network types in a sample of 1,005 older Chinese adults in Hong Kong and the networks&rsquo; relations to subjective well-being. Given the nature of kinship in Chinese society, we broke down social support provision by closeness of blood ties (immediate kin, distant kin, and non-kin). Using <I>K</I>-means cluster analysis, we identified 5 network types: diverse, friend focused, restricted, family focused, and distant family. The latter was characterized by few immediate kin but mostly distant kin. Diverse and family-focused networks were most beneficial to well-being, whereas restricted networks were least. Distant family networks were associated with only marginally lower well-being than family-focused networks and were comparable to friend-focused networks. Results suggested the importance of the extended family in support provision for Chinese older adults, especially in the absence of immediate kin and friends. Implications of the present findings for other cultural groups are discussed.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheng, S.-T., Lee, C. K. L., Chan, A. C. M., Leung, E. M. F., Lee, J.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:20 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp075</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social Network Types and Subjective Well-being in Chinese Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>722</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>713</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/723?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Felt Obligation to Help Others as a Protective Factor Against Losses in Psychological Well-being Following Functional Decline in Middle and Later Life]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/723?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study examined felt obligation to help others in two domains (close others and society) as protective factors against losses in psychological well-being following functional decline. Lagged-dependent regression models were estimated using data from 849 respondents aged 35&ndash;74 years and without any functional limitations at baseline in the 1995&ndash;2005 National Survey of Midlife in the United States. Greater felt obligation to help close others protected against declining self-acceptance in the face of more severe functional decline, and greater felt obligation to help society protected against declining personal growth and self-acceptance. Greater felt obligation to help close others and society protected against increasing depressive symptoms at younger ages in adulthood. Findings suggest the importance for additional research on how aspects of altruism can promote psychological adaptation to declining functional health in middle and later life.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greenfield, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp074</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Felt Obligation to Help Others as a Protective Factor Against Losses in Psychological Well-being Following Functional Decline in Middle and Later Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>732</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>723</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/733?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rapid Emotion Regulation After Mood Induction: Age and Individual Differences]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/733?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Previous research has suggested that emotion regulation improves with age. This study examined both age and individual differences in online emotion regulation after a negative mood induction. We found evidence that older adults were more likely to rapidly regulate their emotions than were younger adults. Moreover, older adults who rapidly regulated had lower trait anxiety and depressive symptoms and higher levels of optimism than their same-age peers who did not rapidly regulate. Measuring mood change over an extended time revealed that older rapid regulators still reported increased levels of positive affect over 20 min later, whereas young adult rapid regulators&rsquo; moods had declined. These results highlight the importance of considering individual differences when examining age differences in online emotion regulation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larcom, M. J., Isaacowitz, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp077</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rapid Emotion Regulation After Mood Induction: Age and Individual Differences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>741</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>733</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/742?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Associations Between Psychological Distress, Learning, and Memory in Spouse Caregivers of Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/742?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Family caregivers of older adults experience high levels of chronic stress and psychological distress, which are known to impair cognition. Very little research, however, has assessed the impact of caregiving on key cognitive outcomes such as learning and memory. This study compared 16 spouse caregivers with 16 matched controls using standardized neuropsychological measures of learning, episodic memory, and working memory. Analyses compared groups on these cognitive outcomes and examined whether psychological distress mediated group differences in cognition. Results indicated that caregivers were significantly more distressed than non-caregivers and exhibited deficits in learning, recall of episodic information after short and long delays, and working memory. Furthermore, the majority of group differences in cognitive outcomes were mediated by psychological distress. This study adds to a small body of literature demonstrating impaired cognitive functioning among family caregivers. It also suggests that distress is one of a number of possible underlying mechanisms leading to disruptions in learning and memory in this population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mackenzie, C. S., Wiprzycka, U. J., Hasher, L., Goldstein, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp076</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Associations Between Psychological Distress, Learning, and Memory in Spouse Caregivers of Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>746</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>742</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/749?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editing in the Rearview Mirror]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/749?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferraro, K. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp083</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editing in the Rearview Mirror]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>749</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>749</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/750?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Childhood Living Conditions, Socioeconomic Position in Adulthood, and Cognition in Later Life: Exploring the Associations]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/750?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This study examined the association between childhood living conditions, socioeconomic position in adulthood, and cognition in later life. Two questions were addressed: Is there an association between childhood living conditions and late-life cognition, and if so, is the association modified or mediated by adult socioeconomic position?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Nationally representative data of the Swedish population aged 77 years and older were obtained from the 1992 and 2002 Swedish Panel Study of Living Conditions of the Oldest Old (SWEOLD). Cognition was assessed with an abbreviated version of the Mini-Mental State Examination scale. Childhood living conditions were assessed by self-reports of childhood living conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The results showed independent associations between conflicts in the household during childhood, father's social class, education, own social class in adulthood, and cognition in later life. Exposure to conflicts during childhood, having a father classified as a manual worker, low education, and/or being classified as a manual worker in adulthood was associated with lower levels of cognition in old age. There seemed to be no modifying effect of adult socioeconomic position on the association between childhood conditions and cognition in later life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This suggests the importance of childhood living conditions in maintaining cognitive function even in late life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fors, S., Lennartsson, C., Lundberg, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Childhood Living Conditions, Socioeconomic Position in Adulthood, and Cognition in Later Life: Exploring the Associations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>757</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>750</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/758?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying the Poorest Older Americans]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/758?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Public policies target a subset of the population defined as poor or needy, but rarely are people poor or needy in the same way. This is particularly true among older adults. This study investigates poverty among older adults in order to identify who among them is financially worst off.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We use 20 years of data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey to examine the income and consumption of older Americans.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The poverty rate is cut in fourth if both income and consumption are used to define poverty. Those most likely to be poor defined by only income but not poor defined by income and consumption together are married, White, and homeowners and have a high school diploma or higher. The income poor alone display sufficient assets to raise consumption above poverty thresholds, whereas the consumption poor are shown to have income just above the poverty threshold and few assets.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The poorest among the older population are those who are income and consumption poor. Understanding the nature of this double poverty population is important in measuring the success of future public policies to reduce poverty among this group.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fisher, J. D., Johnson, D. S., Marchand, J. T., Smeeding, T. M., Torrey, B. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying the Poorest Older Americans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>766</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>758</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/767?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Childlessness and the Economic Well-being of Older Americans]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/767?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The study's purpose is to examine the relationship between childlessness and two key indicators of older Americans&rsquo; economic well-being: income and wealth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using the Health and Retirement Survey, the study estimates this relationship and compares findings from standard ordinary least squares, random effects, quantile regression, and two propensity score models.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Compared with married parents, childless married couples tend to have slightly more income and about 5% more wealth. Unmarried childless men enjoy no income advantage over unmarried fathers but have 24%&ndash;33% more wealth. Compared with older unmarried mothers, unmarried childless women have 12%&ndash;31% more income and about 33% more wealth. The strength of these relationships increases as one moves up the distribution of income or wealth.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>This study provides evidence on the relationship between childlessness and both income and wealth, including the first evidence for men. The findings may be useful for persons concerned about the determinants of childless adults&rsquo; well-being as well as the long-run financial demands on public programs that provide income support, health and nursing home care, and social services for older Americans.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plotnick, R. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Childlessness and the Economic Well-being of Older Americans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>776</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>767</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/777?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does Household Composition Explain Welfare Regime Poverty Risks for Older Adults and Other Household Members?]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/777?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This cross-national study examines the poverty of older adults and their household members and relates the risk of poverty to macrolevel state approaches to welfare as well as to microlevel composition of households.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data on individuals in households with older adults for 22 countries come from the Luxembourg Income Survey. Robust cluster analysis relates the risk of poverty to the type of state welfare regime; the characteristics of the household head (age, gender, marital status, and education); as well as the household's numbers of earners, older adults, and children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Persons in households with older adults are significantly less likely to be poor in countries with social democratic and conservative welfare regimes than in Taiwan, an exemplar of limited social welfare programs. Controlling for country differences in household composition increases the differences in poverty risks. Living with fewer children, more older adults, and more earners lowers the risk of poverty, as does having a married and better educated household head.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Countries with more generous social welfare provisions have lower risks of poverty despite having household characteristics that are comparatively unfavorable. As Taiwan demonstrates, household composition, particularly a reliance on multigenerational households, compensates for limited state welfare programs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tai, T.-o, Treas, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does Household Composition Explain Welfare Regime Poverty Risks for Older Adults and Other Household Members?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>787</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>777</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/788?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Broader View of Family Caregiving: Effects of Caregiving and Caregiver Conditions on Depressive Symptoms, Health, Work, and Social Isolation]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/788?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Informal caregivers provide the majority of long-term care. This study examined six health and psychosocial outcomes of caregiving, in the context of multiple characteristics of the caregiving situation, in a representative, statewide sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data came from 4,041 respondents to the 2007 Connecticut Long-Term Care Needs Assessment. Analyses investigated whether caregiving negatively affects depressive symptoms, health, missing work, and social isolation. Logistic regressions tested the independent effects of caregiver characteristics and conditions of the caregiving situation on these health and psychosocial outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Caregivers rate their health better than noncaregivers and do not report more depressive symptoms or social isolation. Living with the care receiver, inadequate income, and care receivers&rsquo; unmet need for community-based long-term care services relate to multiple negative outcomes. Care receiver memory problems and caregiver/care receiver relationship do not relate to health or psychosocial outcomes when these other factors are considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Caregiving per se does not lead to symptoms of depression, poor health, or social isolation. Many caregivers do need supports in training and education, respite, and physical and mental health care. Such programs should provide outreach to caregivers facing specific stressful conditions, as not all caregivers experience negative consequences.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robison, J., Fortinsky, R., Kleppinger, A., Shugrue, N., Porter, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp015</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Broader View of Family Caregiving: Effects of Caregiving and Caregiver Conditions on Depressive Symptoms, Health, Work, and Social Isolation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>798</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>788</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family Caregiver Skills in Medication Management for Hospice Patients: A Qualitative Study to Define a Construct]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/6/799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To propose a theoretical construct of family caregiver skills in effective medication management for home hospice patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Semistructured face-to-face interviews were conducted with 22 hospice providers (14 nurses, 4 physicians, and 4 social workers) and 23 family caregivers (10 daughters, 4 wives, 2 husbands, and 7 others) of elderly patients (&ge;60 years old) who were receiving home services from four hospice care programs in the Chicago metropolitan area.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Although both groups identified similar skill sets, hospice providers emphasized technical skills such as administering medications, and family caregivers valued management skills such as organizing medications, coordinating with hired caregivers, and providing care to patients who resisted treatment. We defined effective medication management in hospice as caregivers&rsquo; ability to effectively relieve symptoms with pharmacological interventions by successfully utilizing skills related to <I>teamwork</I> (coordinate with hospice providers and with other family or hired caregivers), <I>organization</I> (acquire, store, track, and discard medications), <I>symptom knowledge</I> (recognize and interpret common symptoms), <I>medication knowledge</I> (understand the basics of pharmacology and medication administration), and <I>personhood</I> (understand and respond to the patient's needs).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>The proposed construct of medication management skills in hospice will help guide future development of training interventions and clinical assessment tools.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lau, D. T., Kasper, J. D., Hauser, J. M., Berdes, C., Chang, C.-H., Berman, R. L., Masin-Peters, J., Paice, J., Emanuel, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:49:21 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family Caregiver Skills in Medication Management for Hospice Patients: A Qualitative Study to Define a Construct]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>807</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cover]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cover]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cover</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PhyScience]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PhyScience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Matters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PhySciencetoc]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PhySciencetoc]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Matters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Matters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Soctoc]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/NP-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Soctoc]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Matters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/543?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trajectory of Declines in Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Women: Social Cognitive Influences]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/543?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Studies examining physical activity behavior suggest that activity levels decline with age. Such declines are particularly problematic among older adults in light of the research suggesting a protective effect of physical activity on numerous physical health outcomes associated with independent living. Despite a growing recognition of the importance of a physically active lifestyle, little is known about the role of demographic and psychosocial variables on this trajectory of change. In this study, the roles played by outcome expectations, self-efficacy, and functional limitations on changes in physical activity levels over a 2-year period in older women were assessed using latent growth curve modeling. Data were obtained from 249 community-dwelling older women (<I>M</I> age = 68.12, <I>n</I> = 81 Black, and <I>n</I> = 168 White). Demographic, health status, and psychosocial data were collected via self-report upon entry into the study. Self-reported physical activity was assessed at baseline and again at 12 and 24 months. As expected, physical activity declined over the 2-year period. Self-efficacy demonstrated an indirect association with the trajectory of decline in physical activity through functional limitations. Importantly, the pattern of relationships appears independent of demographic factors and chronic health conditions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McAuley, E., Hall, K. S., Motl, R. W., White, S. M., Wojcicki, T. R., Hu, L., Doerksen, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trajectory of Declines in Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Women: Social Cognitive Influences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>550</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>543</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/551?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceptions of Social Transgressions in Adulthood]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/551?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>People may react differently when individuals of different ages commit a social faux pas. Younger (22 to 35 years old) and older (65 to 77 years old) participants read vignettes where age of characters committing social transgressions varied (young vs. old). Participants rated whether the offended person would respond with engagement, confrontational, and avoidant behaviors and how much people would blame or forgive the transgressor. Multilevel models revealed endorsement of avoidant behaviors with older transgressors, confrontational behaviors with younger transgressors, and engagement behaviors with both. Levels of blame and forgiveness mediated this association, with less blame and greater forgiveness of older adults. Discussion focuses on the social input model and why adults may regulate reactions to interpersonal problems with older adults.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, L. M., Charles, S. T., Fingerman, K. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp062</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceptions of Social Transgressions in Adulthood]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>559</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>551</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/560?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Caregiver-Recipient Closeness and Symptom Progression in Alzheimer Disease. The Cache County Dementia Progression Study]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/560?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Applying Rusbult's investment model of dyadic relationships, we examined the effect of caregiver&ndash;care recipient relationship closeness (RC) on cognitive and functional decline in Alzheimer's disease. After diagnosis, 167 participants completed up to six visits, observed over an average of 20 months. Participants were 64% women, had a mean age of 86 years, and mean dementia duration of 4 years. Caregiver-rated closeness was measured using a six-item scale. In mixed models adjusted for dementia severity, dyads with higher levels of closeness (<I>p</I> &lt; .05) and with spouse caregivers (<I>p</I> = .01) had slower cognitive decline. Effect of higher RC on functional decline was greater with spouse caregivers (<I>p</I> = .007). These findings of attenuated Alzheimer's dementia (AD) decline with closer relationships, particularly with spouse caregivers, are consistent with investment theory. Future interventions designed to enhance the caregiving dyadic relationship may help slow decline in AD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Norton, M. C., Piercy, K. W., Rabins, P. V., Green, R. C., Breitner, J. C. S., Ostbye, T., Corcoran, C., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., Lyketsos, C. G., Tschanz, J. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp052</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Caregiver-Recipient Closeness and Symptom Progression in Alzheimer Disease. The Cache County Dementia Progression Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>568</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>560</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/569?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perceptual Inhibition is Associated with Sensory Integration in Standing Postural Control Among Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/569?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In older adults, maintaining balance and processing information typically interfere with each other, suggesting that executive functions may be engaged for both. We investigated associations between measures of inhibitory processes and standing postural control in healthy young and older adults. Perceptual and motor inhibition was measured using a protocol adapted from Nassauer and Halperin (2003, Dissociation of perceptual and motor inhibition processes through the use of novel computerized conflict tasks. <I>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</I>, 9, 25&ndash;30). These measures were then correlated to postural sway during standing conditions that required resolving various levels of sensory conflict, for example, world-fixed versus sway-referenced floor and visual scene. In the older adults, perceptual inhibition was positively correlated with sway amplitude on a sway-referenced floor and with a fixed visual scene (<I>r</I> = .68, <I>p</I> &lt; .001). Motor inhibition was not correlated with sway on either group. Perceptual inhibition may be a component of the sensory integration process important for maintaining balance in older adults.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redfern, M. S., Jennings, J. R., Mendelson, D., Nebes, R. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perceptual Inhibition is Associated with Sensory Integration in Standing Postural Control Among Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>576</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>569</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/577?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The ACTIVE Cognitive Training Interventions and the Onset of and Recovery from Suspected Clinical Depression]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/577?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We evaluated the effects of the 3 cognitive interventions fielded in the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly study on 2 subsets of participants&mdash;1,606 without and 424 with suspected clinical depression at baseline. In the former group, only the speed of processing (vs. no-contact control) intervention had a significant effect, with its participants being 38% less likely to develop suspected clinical depression at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62; <I>p</I> &lt; .01). None of the interventions had a significant effect on recovery from suspected clinical depression in the latter group. Although the etiological mechanism of the speed of processing&rsquo;s protective effect was not isolated, it may result from successful adaptation to age-related changes through selective optimization with compensation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolinsky, F. D., Mahncke, H. W., Weg, M. W. V., Martin, R., Unverzagt, F. W., Ball, K. K., Jones, R. N., Tennstedt, S. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The ACTIVE Cognitive Training Interventions and the Onset of and Recovery from Suspected Clinical Depression]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>585</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>577</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/586?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Individual Well-being in Middle and Older Adulthood: Do Spousal Beliefs Matter?]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/586?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Associations between health, control beliefs, and well-being in later life are frequently conceptualized in terms of the characteristics of individuals. However, spousal interdependencies in psychosocial characteristics are also likely to be relevant for well-being. The present study investigated associations of self-rated health, control, and relationship closeness with life satisfaction and positive and negative affect in a sample of 2,235 spousal dyads. A significant proportion of variance in health, control, closeness, and well-being occurred between dyads. Individuals&rsquo; self-rated health, control, and relationship closeness were associated with higher well-being. Spouses&rsquo; self-rated health and control beliefs were consistently and positively associated with individuals&rsquo; well-being; however, effect sizes were small. Some evidence for individual&rsquo;s control beliefs buffering the association between health and well-being emerged, whereas spouses&rsquo; perceived control was not a significant moderator of the health&ndash;well-being association. Results highlight the importance of couple interdependencies for contextualizing health and well-being in older adulthood.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Windsor, T. D., Ryan, L. H., Smith, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Individual Well-being in Middle and Older Adulthood: Do Spousal Beliefs Matter?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>596</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>586</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/597?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Predictors of Normal and Successful Aging Among Urban-Dwelling Elderly Brazilians]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/597?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The association of successful aging with demographic, socioeconomic, and medical characteristics in healthy community-dwelling Brazilian individuals aged 60 years and older (<I>N</I> = 345) was investigated. Participants were classified as successful (<I>n</I> = 214, 62%) or normal (<I>n</I> = 131, 38%) agers. Successful agers participated in significantly more leisure activities (34%) than did normal agers (21%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the number of living children was a risk factor, whereas confidants and family income were protective factors for successful aging.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chaves, M. L., Camozzato, A. L., Eizirik, C. L., Kaye, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp059</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Predictors of Normal and Successful Aging Among Urban-Dwelling Elderly Brazilians]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>602</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>597</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Threat Perception in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Dementia]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia affect many aspects of emotion processing. Even though the ability to detect threat is a particularly important aspect of emotion processing, no study to date has assessed threat perception in either of these groups. The purpose of the present study was to test whether individuals with MCI (<I>n</I> = 38) and mild dementia (<I>n</I> = 34) have difficulty differentiating between faces and situations normatively judged to be either high or low in threat relative to age-matched controls (<I>n</I> = 34). To achieve this aim, all participants completed 2 danger rating tasks that involved viewing and rating high- and low-danger images. It was also assessed whether threat perception was related to cognitive functioning and emotion recognition. The results indicated that all 3 groups were accurately, and comparably, able to differentiate high from low-danger faces. However, the dementia group had difficulties differentiating high from low-danger situations, which reflected a bias to overattribute the level of threat posed by normatively judged nonthreatening situations. This difficulty was related to more general cognitive decline.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry, J. D., Thompson, C., Ruffman, T., Leslie, F., Withall, A., Sachdev, P., Brodaty, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Threat Perception in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Early Dementia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>607</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/608?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Long-term Maintenance of Retest Learning in Young Old and Oldest Old Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/608?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This study examined the maintenance of retest learning benefits in young old and oldest old adults over an 8-month period in 3 cognitive abilities: reasoning, perceptual-motor speed, and visual attention. Twenty-four young old (aged 70&ndash;79 years, <I>M</I> = 74.2) and 23 oldest old adults (aged 80&ndash;90 years, <I>M</I> = 83.6) who participated in a previously published study (Yang, L., Krampe, R. T., &amp; Baltes, P. B. [2006]. Basic forms of cognitive plasticity extended into the oldest-old: Retest learning, age, and cognitive functioning. <I>Psychology and Aging, 21,</I> 372&ndash;378) returned after an 8-month delay to complete 2 follow-up retest sessions. The results demonstrated that both young old and oldest old groups maintained about 50% of the original retest learning benefits. This extends the earlier findings of substantial long-term cognitive training maintenance in young old adults to a context of retest learning with oldest old adults, and thus portrays a positive message for cognitive plasticity of the oldest old.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, L., Krampe, R. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Long-term Maintenance of Retest Learning in Young Old and Oldest Old Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>611</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>608</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/612?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Benefits of Negative Social Exchanges for Emotional Closeness]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/612?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Negative exchanges in social relationships have traditionally been studied as having negative consequences. This study explored whether they might have positive effects for relationship closeness. The sample included 351 adults, aged between 18 and 91 years, residing in Hong Kong, China. Closeness of social partners to the participants was measured by the Social Convoy Questionnaire, and the levels of negative exchanges and social support from each social partner were assessed. Multilevel analyses revealed that more negative exchanges were associated with a more positive change in closeness over a 2-year period, even after statistically controlling for social support and sociostructural characteristics of the participant and the social partner. Findings extended our knowledge on the positive effects of negative exchanges and their moderating conditions.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fung, H. H., Yeung, D. Y., Li, K.-K., Lang, F. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Benefits of Negative Social Exchanges for Emotional Closeness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>621</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>612</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/625?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why Is the Educational Gradient of Mortality Steeper for Men?]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/625?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>It is often documented that the educational gradient of mortality is steeper for men than for women; yet, the explanation remains a matter of debate. We examine gender differences in the gradients within the context of marriage to determine whether overall differences reflect gender differences in health behaviors or a greater influence of men's education on spousal health.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used data from the 1986 through 1996 National Health Interview Survey Linked Mortality Files for non-Hispanic White adults aged 55&ndash;84 years at the time of survey. We estimated Cox proportional hazards models to examine the gradients (<I>N</I> = 180,208).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The educational gradient of mortality is marginally steeper for men than for women when aggregating across marital statuses; yet, this reflects a steeper gradient among unmarried men, with low-educated never married men exhibiting high levels of mortality. The gradient among unmarried men is steeper than unmarried women for causes that share smoking as a major risk factor, supporting a behavioral explanation for differences in the gradient. No gender difference in the gradient is observed for married adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Low education and unmarried status exert a synergistic effect on men's mortality. Unmarried, low-educated men may lack social supports that encourage positive health behaviors.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Montez, J. K., Hayward, M. D., Brown, D. C., Hummer, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp013</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why Is the Educational Gradient of Mortality Steeper for Men?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>634</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>625</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/635?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Complementary Therapy Use and Health Self-Management Among Rural Older Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/635?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This article describes dimensions of complementary therapy use among rural older adults, employs these dimensions to delineate sets of complementary therapy use, and describes the personal characteristics related to each set of complementary therapy use.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data are from in-depth interviews conducted with 62 African American and White rural older adults.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three dimensions of complementary therapy use are delineated: types of therapies used, mindfulness in therapy use, and sharing information with conventional health care providers. The intersection of these dimensions indicates 5 patterned sets of complementary therapy use among rural older adults: (a) mindful use of only home remedies; (b) mindful use of home remedies and contemporary supplements; (c) mindful use of home remedies, contemporary supplements, and complementary practices; (d) nonmindful use of home remedies and contemporary supplements; and (e) use of conventional care only. Involvement in the 5 sets of therapy use is related to sex, ethnicity, educational attainment, and migration.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Understanding how older adults include sets of complementary therapies in their health self-management is important for improving their health care resources, expectations, awareness, and priorities.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arcury, T. A., Grzywacz, J. G., Stoller, E. P., Bell, R. A., Altizer, K. P., Chapman, C., Quandt, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Complementary Therapy Use and Health Self-Management Among Rural Older Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>643</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>635</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/644?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Volunteer Dynamics of Older Americans]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/644?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The impending retirement of boomers has spurred interest in tapping their productive energies to benefit society. This study examined volunteer transitions among older adults to understand the factors that affect volunteer dynamics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, the analysis examined entries into and exits from formal volunteer activities between 1996 and 2004 by adults aged 55&ndash;65 at study baseline. The study showed the duration of volunteer activities, the probability that older adults start and stop volunteering, and the factors that significantly predict volunteer transitions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The findings reveal considerable stability among both volunteers and nonvolunteers; however, older adults are more likely to stop volunteering than to start. Volunteers who contribute intensely and for many years and who are married to volunteers are the least likely to quit. And nonvolunteers are more likely to start volunteering if they have been uninvolved for few years and their spouses volunteer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The results point to the need to focus efforts on retaining older volunteers to maximize volunteer engagement during later years. Recruiting older adults in volunteer activities early on, ideally before they retire, could also help meet volunteer needs.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Butrica, B. A., Johnson, R. W., Zedlewski, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbn042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Volunteer Dynamics of Older Americans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>655</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>644</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Role Transitions</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/656?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Effect of Retirement on Weight]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/656?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>People who are close to retirement age show the highest rates of weight gain and obesity. We investigate the effect of retirement on the change in body mass index (BMI) in diverse groups varying by wealth status and occupation type.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Six panels of the Health and Retirement Study (1992&ndash;2002) on individuals aged 50&ndash;71 were used (<I>N</I> = 37,807). We used fixed-effects regression models with instrumental variables method to estimate the causal effect of retirement on change in the BMI.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Retirement leads to modest weight gain, 0.24 BMI on average. Weight gain with retirement was found among people who were already overweight and those with lower wealth retiring from physically demanding occupations. The cumulative effect of aging among people in their 50s, however, outweighs the effect of retirement; the average BMI gain between ages 50 and 60 is 1.30, 5 times the effect of retirement.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Given the increasing number of people approaching retirement age, the population level impact of the weight gain ascribed to retirement on health outcomes and health care system might be significant. Future research should evaluate programs targeted to older adults who are most likely to gain weight with retirement.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chung, S., Domino, M. E., Stearns, S. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbn044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Effect of Retirement on Weight]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>665</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>656</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Role Transitions</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/666?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Later-Life Mental Health in Europe: A Country-Level Comparison]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/666?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To investigate the influence of country of residence on depression and well-being among older Europeans, after establishing the between-country measurement invariance of both constructs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used data from a cross-sectional nationally representative population-based sample of older Europeans, the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The analysis sample comprised 13,498 older Europeans from nine countries. The EURO-D was used to measure depression, and a well-being outcome was derived from self-report items available in SHARE. The between-country measurement invariance of both mental health outcomes was established using modern psychometric modeling techniques.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>After adjustment for demographic characteristics and the presence of chronic illness, Spain was the country scoring highest on depression and Denmark highest on well-being. Optimal mental health was associated with higher educational attainment and being married.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>There is considerable between-country heterogeneity in later-life mental health in Europe. The Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands, and Austria, do best (low depression/high well-being), followed by Germany and France, whereas residents of Spain, Italy, and Greece report the worst mental health.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ploubidis, G. B., Grundy, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Later-Life Mental Health in Europe: A Country-Level Comparison]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>676</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>666</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Mental Health</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/677?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Employment Status and Depressive Symptoms in Koreans: Results From a Baseline Survey of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/5/677?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We investigated the association between employment status and depressive symptoms among Korean individuals according to age and gender.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data were obtained from a subsample of 3,907 men and 4,914 women aged 45 years and older without any severe disabilities who participated in the 2006 cross-sectional baseline survey of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA). We compared depressive symptoms as determined by the Center for Epidemiological Studies&ndash;Depression 10-item scale, adjusting for socioeconomic status, physical and cognitive function, and chronic disease. Using multiple regression analysis, we determined both age- and gender-specific differences associated with depressive symptoms and employment status.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Employment was associated with fewer depressive symptoms among middle-aged men but not among older men. Unemployment was associated with more depressive symptoms among middle-aged women but not among older women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Work role did not provide any benefit for depressive symptoms among older men and women. We discuss the increased depressive symptoms among older employed men and the differential association of employment status with age and gender in the context of Korean social structure.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jang, S.-N., Cho, S.-I., Chang, J., Boo, K., Shin, H.-G., Lee, H., Berkman, L. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:31:53 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp014</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Employment Status and Depressive Symptoms in Koreans: Results From a Baseline Survey of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>683</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>677</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Mental Health</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cover]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cover]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cover</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PhyScience]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PhyScience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Matters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[PhySciencetoc]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[PhySciencetoc]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Matters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Social]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Social]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Matters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-d?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Soctoc]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/NP-d?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Soctoc]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Matters</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/443?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Older Adults Place Lower Value on Choice Relative to Young Adults]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/443?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Choice is highly valued in modern society, from the supermarket to the hospital; however, it remains unknown whether older and younger adults place the same value on increased choice. The current investigation tested whether 53 older (<I>M</I> age = 75.44 years) versus 53 younger adults (<I>M</I> age = 19.58 years) placed lower value on increased choice by examining the monetary amounts they were willing to pay for increased prescription drug coverage options&mdash;important given the recently implemented Medicare prescription drug program. Results indicate that older adults placed lower value on increasing choice sets relative to younger adults, who placed progressively higher value on increasingly larger choice sets. These results are discussed regarding their implications for theory and policy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikels, J. A., Reed, A. E., Simon, K. I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Older Adults Place Lower Value on Choice Relative to Young Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>446</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>443</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/447?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aging and Selective Engagement: The Moderating Impact of Motivation on Older Adults' Resource Utilization]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/447?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Two studies were conducted to examine age differences in the impact of motivation in a social cognitive task. We tested the hypothesis that aging is associated with an increase in the selective engagement of cognitive resources in support of performance. Different-aged adults read descriptions of 2 people in order to determine which was better suited for a particular job. These descriptions contained behaviors that were either consistent or inconsistent with the job, and participants performed the task under conditions of high versus low accountability. Examination of memory for behavioral information revealed that accountability disproportionately affected older adults&rsquo; performance, with the locus of this effect being in conscious recollection processes. This supports the aforementioned selective engagement hypothesis by demonstrating that the differential impact of the motivational manipulation was based in deliberative memory processes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hess, T. M., Germain, C. M., Swaim, E. L., Osowski, N. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aging and Selective Engagement: The Moderating Impact of Motivation on Older Adults' Resource Utilization]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>456</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/457?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Monetary Losses Do Not Loom Large in Later Life: Age Differences in the Framing Effect]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/457?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Studies of the framing effect indicate that individuals are risk averse for decisions framed as gains but risk seeking for decisions framed as losses. However, findings regarding age-related changes in susceptibility to framing are mixed. Recent work demonstrating age-related decreases in reactivity to anticipated monetary losses, but not gains, suggests that older and younger adults might show equivalent risk aversion for gains but discrepant risk seeking for losses. In the current study, older and younger adults completed a monetary gambling task in which they chose between sure options and risky gambles (the expected outcomes of which were equated). Although both groups demonstrated risk aversion in the gain frame, only younger adults showed risk seeking in the loss frame.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikels, J. A., Reed, A. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Monetary Losses Do Not Loom Large in Later Life: Age Differences in the Framing Effect]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>460</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>457</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/461?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective Study of Associations Among Positive Emotion and Functional Status in Older Patients With Coronary Artery Disease]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/461?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We examined associations between positive emotion (PE) and functional status (Duke Activity Status Inventory) in 948 coronary artery disease (CAD) patients (35.1% women; age <I>M</I> = 70.1 years, <I>SD</I> = 6.3). Emotion and function measures were gathered during hospitalization and annually for 3 years. We used random coefficient models to examine PE during hospitalization and follow-up, as a predictor of change in function. Analyses adjusted for baseline functional status, negative emotion, social support, marital status, and disease severity. Sex was examined as a moderator of effects. PE assessed during hospitalization was a significant predictor of change in function such that lower levels of PE were associated with accelerated decline in function. Lower levels of PE during follow-up were also related to increasing decline in function but only in men. Thus, our findings indicate that PE is associated with less decline in functional status following hospitalization for CAD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brummett, B. H., Morey, M. C., Boyle, S. H., Mark, D. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective Study of Associations Among Positive Emotion and Functional Status in Older Patients With Coronary Artery Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>469</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>461</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/470?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A New Look at Retest Learning in Older Adults: Learning in the Absence of Item-Specific Effects]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/470?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We investigated retest learning (i.e., performance improvement through retest practice) in the absence of item-specific effects (i.e., learning through memorizing or becoming familiar with specific items) with older adults. Thirty-one older adults (ages 60&ndash;82 years, <I>M</I> = 71.10, <I>SD</I> = 6.27) participated in an eight-session self-guided retest program. To eliminate item-specific effects, parallel versions of representative psychometric measures for Inductive Reasoning, Perceptual Speed, and Visual Attention were developed and administered across retest sessions. The results showed substantial non-item-specific retest learning, even controlling for anxiety, suggesting that retest learning in older adults can occur at a more conceptual level.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, L., Reed, M., Russo, F. A., Wilkinson, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp040</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A New Look at Retest Learning in Older Adults: Learning in the Absence of Item-Specific Effects]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>473</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>470</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/474?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cognitive Aging and Adaptive Foraging Behavior]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/474?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We conducted two experiments comparing younger and older adults&rsquo; ability to adjust their foraging behavior as a function of task characteristics. Participants foraged for fish in a virtual landscape and had to decide when to move between ponds so as to maximize the number of fish caught. In the first experiment, participants were left to generate their own foraging strategy, whereas in the second experiment, participants were instructed to use an incremental strategy that has been shown to produce optimal performance in this task. Our results suggest that both younger and older adults are adaptive in the sense of adjusting the parameters of their foraging strategy as a function of task characteristics. Nevertheless, older adults show overall poorer performance compared with younger adults even when instructed to use an optimal strategy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mata, R., Wilke, A., Czienskowski, U.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cognitive Aging and Adaptive Foraging Behavior]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>481</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>474</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/482?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Task Demands Moderate Stereotype Threat Effects on Memory Performance]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/482?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Previous research has demonstrated that older adults&rsquo; memory performance is adversely affected by the explicit activation of negative stereotypes about aging. In this study, we examined the impact of stereotype threat on recognition memory, with specific interest in (a) the generalizability of previously observed effects, (b) the subjective experience of memory, and (c) the moderating effects of task demands. Older participants subjected to threat performed worse than did those in a nonthreat condition but only when performance constraints were high (i.e., memory decisions had to be made within a limited time frame). This effect was reflected in the subjective experience of memory, with participants in this condition having a lower ratio of "remember" to "know" responses. The absence of threat effects when constraints were minimal provides important boundary information regarding stereotype influences on memory performance.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hess, T. M., Emery, L., Queen, T. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Task Demands Moderate Stereotype Threat Effects on Memory Performance]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>486</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>482</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Children in an Aging Society]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>This article explores ways in which population aging in the United States between 2010 and 2030 might impact the well-being of children, with a distinction made between advantaged and disadvantaged children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A variety of economic and demographic statistics are used to describe the changing age structure of the population and changing public spending on older people and children. Data from the 1985 General Social Survey and Wave 2 of the National Survey of Families and Households are also used to examine connections between older people and children.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In recent decades, there has been a graying of the federal budget, and programs for children have received a declining proportion of domestic spending. These trends will be exaggerated between 2010 and 2030 unless structural changes occur. Grandparents may provide increasing resources for their grandchildren. Age segregation results in relatively few older people being directly involved with children not related to them by kinship.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>The implications of population aging for children are relevant primarily for disadvantaged children. Disadvantaged children have grandparents with fewest resources and are most in need of public spending. As costs of supporting the older population increase, intentional social changes will be needed to prevent growing inequality among children.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uhlenberg, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp001</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Children in an Aging Society]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>496</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/497?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality of Marriages in Later Life and Emotional and Social Loneliness]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/497?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>We examine the extent of emotional and social loneliness among older people and how the evaluation of the functioning and quality of marriages plays a role.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Data on 755 respondents aged 64&ndash;92 are taken from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (Wave 2001&ndash;2002). Hierarchical negative binomial regression analysis is used.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Between 1 in 4 and 5 older adults who are married exhibit moderate or strong emotional or social loneliness. Stronger emotional and social loneliness is observed in adults whose spouse has health problems, who do not often receive emotional support from the spouse, who have nonfrequent conversations or are in disagreement, or who evaluate their current sex life as not (very) pleasant or not applicable. Emotional loneliness is stronger among women in second marriages, whereas marked social loneliness is especially characteristic of older men with disabled spouses. Moreover, smaller social networks and less contact with children also increase emotional and social loneliness in later life.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Differentiating marital quality and gender provides greater insight into emotional and social loneliness in married older people.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Jong Gierveld, J., Broese van Groenou, M., Hoogendoorn, A. W., Smit, J. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbn043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality of Marriages in Later Life and Emotional and Social Loneliness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>506</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>497</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Coupling</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/507?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonmarital Cohabitation Among Older Finnish Men and Women: Socioeconomic Characteristics and Forms of Union Dissolution]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/507?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Nonmarital cohabitation has increased substantially among older adults. Our objective was to enhance understanding of cohabitation by comparing elderly cohabiters with the married according to socioeconomic status and union dissolution.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We used population registration data on Finns aged 65 years and older living with a cohabiting partner or a married spouse in 1997 (<I>n</I> = 140,902). The participants were characterized according to various socioeconomic indicators and followed for separation, institutionalization, bereavement, and death until 2002.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Elderly cohabitation almost doubled between 1990 and 2003, with 3.4% of men and 2.1% of women currently cohabiting. Low educational attainment, low occupational social class, and living in rented housing were associated with cohabiting rather than being married. Low income among men but high income among women predicted cohabitation. Cohabiting unions were more likely than marriages to end through separation, institutionalization, bereavement, and death, with the highest excess risk being for separation. These effects were mostly independent of socioeconomic factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>In socioeconomic terms, elderly cohabiters are mostly less privileged than the married. Nonmarital unions seem somewhat less protective than marriages against institutionalization and death. The substantially higher risk of separation also puts cohabiters at higher risk of losing potential care and support provided by coresident partners.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moustgaard, H., Martikainen, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonmarital Cohabitation Among Older Finnish Men and Women: Socioeconomic Characteristics and Forms of Union Dissolution]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>516</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>507</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Coupling</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/517?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Meaning in Life and Mortality]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/517?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>The purpose of this exploratory study was to see if meaning in life is associated with mortality in old age.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Interviews were conducted with a nationwide sample of older adults (<I>N</I> = 1,361). Data were collected on meaning in life, mortality, and select control measures.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Three main findings emerged from this study. First, the data suggest that older people with a strong sense of meaning in life are less likely to die over the study follow-up period than those who do not have a strong sense of meaning. Second, the findings indicate that the effect of meaning on mortality can be attributed to the potentially important indirect effect that operates through health. Third, further analysis revealed that one dimension of meaning&mdash;having a strong sense of purpose in life&mdash;has a stronger relationship with mortality than other facets of meaning. The main study findings were observed after the effects of attendance at religious services and emotional support were controlled statistically.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>If the results from this study can be replicated, then interventions should be designed to help older people find a greater sense of purpose in life.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krause, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meaning in Life and Mortality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>527</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>517</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Existential Questions of Aging</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/528?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Religion and the Quality of Life in the Last Year of Life]]></title>
<link>http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/64B/4/528?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>Religious involvement in old age appears to remain quite stable until the very end of life, reflecting patterns established earlier in life. Are there differences in quality of life (QOL) for those who are religiously involved in that last year compared with those who are not?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>We studied 499 elderly persons participating in ongoing annual interviews who died in the 12 months following an interview. We examined public and subjective religious involvement and indicators of health-related and psychosocial QOL, including health status and functional ability, family and friendship networks, depression, and well-being.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>More deeply religious respondents were more likely to see friends, and they had better self-rated health, fewer depressive feelings, and were observed by the interviewer to find life more exciting compared with the less religious. Respondents receiving strength and comfort from religion reported poorer self-rated health. Those who attended religious services often were most likely to have attended holiday parties, even after adjusting for health status. Significant interactions indicated that the disabled benefited more from both public and subjective religious involvement than the nondisabled.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Discussion</st>
<p>Overall, QOL in the last year of life is positively related to religious involvement, particularly its more subjective dimensions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idler, E. L., McLaughlin, J., Kasl, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:10:23 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbp028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Religion and the Quality of Life in the Last Year of Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>The Gerontological Society of America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>64B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>537</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>528</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Existential Questions of Aging</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>